CPM is working flawlessly to pursue the Supreme Court verdict on women entry, on the other hand claiming to convince the public, that CPM had done its best to save Sabarimala’s traditions, however the Court had not considered any of CPM’s efforts!
Under the burning circumstances CPM stands less chance against the devotees. This realization had made the leftists come up with a new cooked up story on their efforts. The claim was that though CPM supports the verdict, a bench inclusive of people from reformation forum, Thantris and a representative from the Hindu community to suggest on the traditions and the customs, was there to give explanation to the high court on the issue at the time of hearing.
The state Government is true about the affidavit and the bench of Hindu leaders.
The question is, have the Government mentioned any claim to protect the tradition of the temple? State firmly stuck to the affidavit of 2007. The irony is that at the time of hearing forgetfulness of State’s lawyer Jay Deep Gupta resulted in omitting even the slightest mentioning of the bench. The lawyer who consciously ignored the affidavit’s argument, did remember to speak about women discrimination at Sabarimala, this is clearly reflected in the final judgment made by the Supreme court Justice D.Y Chandrachood.
