Thiruvananthapuram: K Surendran, the BJP state president, has raised concerns over the state secretary of CPI (M) and their purported inability to address queries related to the alleged relation with the black sand businessman. He stated that a staggering amount of ₹96 crores was being procured monthly from the industrialist, by individuals including the Chief Minister, his daughter, and prominent UDF leaders. Surendran contends that the lack of willingness among Kerala’s investigative agencies to summon and interrogate these individuals in connection with the case underscores a severe breakdown of the rule of law in the state.
Highlighting a perceived trend of pressuring businessmen into financial transactions, Surendran asserts that this marks the first instance in Kerala’s history where the Chief Minister and his family are allegedly involved in such extortion. Monthly payments were reportedly made to Veena Vijayan and her company, with the businessman claiming that the funds were exchanged to ensure unhindered business operations. These allegations imply large-scale corruption and illicit activity. Notably, the UDF and CPM are seemingly avoiding discussions on the matter in Puthupally.
Further revelations implicate the UDF candidate’s father, linking UDF leaders to the alleged scheme. This aspect remains unaddressed in the assembly, prompting the BJP’s decision to spotlight the controversy during the upcoming assembly by-elections. A gathering of those implicated in the controversy has garnered attention in Puthupally, casting a shadow of embarrassment over both the ruling party and the opposition.
K Surendran criticises both factions, alleging a shared culture of corruption. He emphasises the BJP’s commitment to focusing on issues of corruption and questionable political dealings during the Puthupally by-election. Should Kerala’s investigation agencies fail to thoroughly probe the matter over the coming months, the BJP expresses its intention to involve central investigative bodies. Calling for a comprehensive inquiry by Kerala’s investigative agencies, Surendran suggests that the ongoing controversy falls within the purview of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Comments